Becker, An excellent. Age., Fay, K. Age., Agnew-Blais, J., Khan, An effective. N., Striegel-Moore, Roentgen. H., Gilman, S. Age. (2011). Social media media visibility and you may adolescent food pathology for the Fiji. The british Log of Psychiatry, 198, 43-fifty.
de Vries, D. A good., Peter, J., de- Graaf, H., Nikken, P. (2016). Adolescents’ social media web site play with, fellow looks-relevant feedback, and body frustration: Testing a mediation model. Log out-of Youthfulness and you will Puberty, 45, 211-224.
Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. Roentgen., Halliwell, Age. (2015). Public reviews to your social media: This new feeling of Facebook into younger women’s human body photo inquiries and you will disposition. Muscles Visualize, thirteen, 38-forty five.
Gender positions, 63, 79-90
Ferguson, C. J. (2013). On the vision of your own beholder: Thin-most readily useful news impacts particular, not very, viewers in the a beneficial meta- analytic overview of looks dissatisfaction in women and you will boys. Mindset Of Common Media Society, 2, 20-37.
Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., Hyde, J. S. (2008). New character of mass media into the looks image concerns one of people: A good meta-study out-of fresh and you will correlational training. Emotional Bulletin, 134, 460-476.
The netherlands, Grams., Tiggemann, Meters. (2016). “Good beats skinny anytime”: Disordered dinner and you may compulsive exercise in females which article fitspiration towards Instagram. Global Journal of Food Disorders, fifty, 76-79.
Holmstrom, A great. J. (2004). The results of the news to the looks photo: A beneficial meta-analysis. Journal out of Sending out Digital News, forty eight, 196-217.
These types of findings blur the possibility relationships anywhere between human body picture and you can mass media and you may recommend a want to then read the
Kim, J.